Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nashville
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.37213100.0%32.9%(+67.1)#235.2%(+64.8)#248
2.3722899.2%32.9%(+66.3)#335.2%(+64.0)#320
3.3720380.8%32.9%(+47.9)#835.2%(+45.6)#649
4.3721976.2%32.9%(+43.2)#1235.2%(+41.0)#797
5.3721072.7%32.9%(+39.7)#1535.2%(+37.5)#928
6.3720867.9%32.9%(+35.0)#1635.2%(+32.7)#1,186
7.3721257.8%32.9%(+24.8)#2935.2%(+22.6)#2,022
8.3720954.5%32.9%(+21.6)#3535.2%(+19.4)#2,401
9.3721753.4%32.9%(+20.5)#3735.2%(+18.2)#2,557
10.3720151.1%32.9%(+18.1)#4835.2%(+15.9)#2,922
11.3721151.0%32.9%(+18.1)#5035.2%(+15.8)#2,931
12.3720650.2%32.9%(+17.2)#5335.2%(+15.0)#3,057
13.3720444.4%32.9%(+11.4)#6735.2%(+9.19)#4,232
14.3720743.4%32.9%(+10.5)#7235.2%(+8.22)#4,466
15.3721438.8%32.9%(+5.90)#9135.2%(+3.66)#5,779
16.3720531.2%32.9%(-1.77)#15635.2%(-4.01)#9,340
17.3721830.4%32.9%(-2.53)#16435.2%(-4.77)#9,784
18.3721628.7%32.9%(-4.26)#19835.2%(-6.50)#10,903
19.3722128.1%32.9%(-4.83)#20735.2%(-7.07)#11,320
20.3721525.2%32.9%(-7.72)#25635.2%(-9.96)#13,418
21.372209.3%32.9%(-23.6)#55035.2%(-25.8)#27,782

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN are:
#1
100.0%
#2
99.2%
#3
80.8%
#4
76.2%
#5
72.7%
#6
67.9%
#7
57.8%
#8
54.5%
#9
53.4%
#10
51.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
37213 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville is 46.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tennessee?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tennessee is 32.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.