Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Personal Care and Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Boykin34.3%2.4%(+31.9)#12.6%(+31.8)#89
2.Glenn Springs33.3%2.4%(+30.9)#22.6%(+30.8)#94
3.Tradesville31.2%2.4%(+28.9)#32.6%(+28.7)#110
4.Clemson University26.7%2.4%(+24.3)#42.6%(+24.2)#142
5.Ashwood23.3%2.4%(+20.9)#52.6%(+20.8)#185
6.Murphys Estates16.3%2.4%(+13.9)#62.6%(+13.7)#367
7.Eureka Mill15.2%2.4%(+12.9)#72.6%(+12.7)#415
8.Shiloh12.7%2.4%(+10.3)#82.6%(+10.1)#582
9.Tigerville12.5%2.4%(+10.1)#92.6%(+9.97)#602
10.Glendale11.7%2.4%(+9.27)#102.6%(+9.09)#697
11.Elgin11.1%2.4%(+8.76)#112.6%(+8.59)#759
12.Bonneau Beach10.9%2.4%(+8.47)#122.6%(+8.30)#803
13.Monetta10.2%2.4%(+7.84)#132.6%(+7.66)#892
14.Clinton9.8%2.4%(+7.37)#142.6%(+7.20)#973
15.Arial9.8%2.4%(+7.37)#152.6%(+7.19)#974
16.Orangeburg9.4%2.4%(+7.05)#162.6%(+6.88)#1,043
17.Alcolu9.4%2.4%(+7.05)#172.6%(+6.87)#1,045
18.Chickasaw Point9.2%2.4%(+6.80)#182.6%(+6.63)#1,099
19.Monarch Mill8.7%2.4%(+6.29)#192.6%(+6.11)#1,242
20.Brookdale8.4%2.4%(+6.02)#202.6%(+5.84)#1,311
21.James Island8.4%2.4%(+5.98)#212.6%(+5.80)#1,318
22.Walhalla8.3%2.4%(+5.88)#222.6%(+5.71)#1,355
23.Cherryvale8.1%2.4%(+5.73)#232.6%(+5.56)#1,395
24.Pomaria7.0%2.4%(+4.59)#242.6%(+4.41)#1,841
25.Bonneau6.9%2.4%(+4.53)#252.6%(+4.35)#1,877
26.Burton6.9%2.4%(+4.47)#262.6%(+4.30)#1,906
27.North Santee6.8%2.4%(+4.41)#272.6%(+4.24)#1,943
28.Helena6.8%2.4%(+4.38)#282.6%(+4.21)#1,958
29.Buffalo6.6%2.4%(+4.26)#292.6%(+4.09)#2,017
30.Due West6.6%2.4%(+4.21)#302.6%(+4.04)#2,041
31.Denmark6.4%2.4%(+3.99)#312.6%(+3.81)#2,182
32.Newberry6.3%2.4%(+3.91)#322.6%(+3.73)#2,247
33.Danwood6.2%2.4%(+3.84)#332.6%(+3.66)#2,311
34.Travelers Rest6.2%2.4%(+3.76)#342.6%(+3.59)#2,362
35.Holly Hill6.0%2.4%(+3.62)#352.6%(+3.44)#2,460
36.Pageland6.0%2.4%(+3.57)#362.6%(+3.39)#2,498
37.Buford5.8%2.4%(+3.43)#372.6%(+3.25)#2,620
38.Jefferson5.8%2.4%(+3.41)#382.6%(+3.24)#2,639
39.Georgetown5.8%2.4%(+3.39)#392.6%(+3.21)#2,662
40.Mount Carmel5.7%2.4%(+3.27)#402.6%(+3.10)#2,767
41.Whitney5.5%2.4%(+3.13)#412.6%(+2.96)#2,906
42.Shell Point5.5%2.4%(+3.09)#422.6%(+2.91)#2,943
43.Pendleton5.2%2.4%(+2.78)#432.6%(+2.60)#3,244
44.Warrenville5.0%2.4%(+2.58)#442.6%(+2.40)#3,520
45.Johnston4.9%2.4%(+2.54)#452.6%(+2.36)#3,560
46.Dunbar4.9%2.4%(+2.52)#462.6%(+2.35)#3,585
47.Laurel Bay4.8%2.4%(+2.36)#472.6%(+2.19)#3,787
48.Barnwell4.7%2.4%(+2.31)#482.6%(+2.14)#3,848
49.Capitol View4.7%2.4%(+2.29)#492.6%(+2.12)#3,884
50.Varnville4.7%2.4%(+2.27)#502.6%(+2.10)#3,909
51.Socastee4.6%2.4%(+2.25)#512.6%(+2.08)#3,937
52.Langley4.6%2.4%(+2.25)#522.6%(+2.07)#3,944
53.Hampton4.6%2.4%(+2.25)#532.6%(+2.07)#3,948
54.Litchfield Beach4.6%2.4%(+2.21)#542.6%(+2.03)#3,997
55.Fort Lawn4.6%2.4%(+2.17)#552.6%(+1.99)#4,072
56.Five Forks4.5%2.4%(+2.14)#562.6%(+1.96)#4,131
57.Duncan4.4%2.4%(+1.99)#572.6%(+1.82)#4,354
58.North Augusta4.2%2.4%(+1.85)#582.6%(+1.67)#4,593
59.Ridgeland4.2%2.4%(+1.80)#592.6%(+1.63)#4,686
60.Campobello4.1%2.4%(+1.75)#602.6%(+1.58)#4,787
61.Surfside Beach4.1%2.4%(+1.75)#612.6%(+1.57)#4,790
62.Wade Hampton4.1%2.4%(+1.71)#622.6%(+1.53)#4,866
63.White Knoll4.0%2.4%(+1.63)#632.6%(+1.45)#5,016
64.Chapin4.0%2.4%(+1.59)#642.6%(+1.41)#5,109
65.Ben Avon3.9%2.4%(+1.52)#652.6%(+1.35)#5,230
66.Edisto3.9%2.4%(+1.52)#662.6%(+1.35)#5,243
67.South Congaree3.9%2.4%(+1.51)#672.6%(+1.34)#5,265
68.Oak Grove3.9%2.4%(+1.48)#682.6%(+1.30)#5,347
69.Gray Court3.8%2.4%(+1.45)#692.6%(+1.27)#5,443
70.Batesburg Leesville3.8%2.4%(+1.44)#702.6%(+1.26)#5,457
71.Northlake3.8%2.4%(+1.41)#712.6%(+1.23)#5,525
72.Lowrys3.7%2.4%(+1.32)#722.6%(+1.14)#5,751
73.Graniteville3.7%2.4%(+1.29)#732.6%(+1.12)#5,826
74.Richburg3.6%2.4%(+1.26)#742.6%(+1.09)#5,911
75.Roebuck3.6%2.4%(+1.25)#752.6%(+1.07)#5,940
76.Branchville3.6%2.4%(+1.18)#762.6%(+1.00)#6,165
77.India Hook3.5%2.4%(+1.15)#772.6%(+0.980)#6,220
78.Bluffton3.5%2.4%(+1.14)#782.6%(+0.970)#6,258
79.Summerville3.5%2.4%(+1.09)#792.6%(+0.917)#6,416
80.Woodruff3.5%2.4%(+1.09)#802.6%(+0.915)#6,424
81.Hollywood3.5%2.4%(+1.08)#812.6%(+0.907)#6,443
82.Red Hill3.5%2.4%(+1.07)#822.6%(+0.893)#6,481
83.Fort Mill3.4%2.4%(+1.02)#832.6%(+0.844)#6,632
84.St Matthews3.4%2.4%(+1.01)#842.6%(+0.838)#6,660
85.Hanahan3.4%2.4%(+0.991)#852.6%(+0.816)#6,726
86.Rowesville3.4%2.4%(+0.990)#862.6%(+0.816)#6,729
87.Saxon3.4%2.4%(+0.981)#872.6%(+0.807)#6,765
88.Ravenel3.4%2.4%(+0.969)#882.6%(+0.795)#6,806
89.Red Bank3.3%2.4%(+0.957)#892.6%(+0.783)#6,845
90.Greer3.3%2.4%(+0.957)#902.6%(+0.782)#6,851
91.Lugoff3.3%2.4%(+0.951)#912.6%(+0.777)#6,862
92.Gaffney3.3%2.4%(+0.943)#922.6%(+0.768)#6,910
93.Central3.3%2.4%(+0.915)#932.6%(+0.741)#6,992
94.Conway3.3%2.4%(+0.915)#942.6%(+0.741)#6,993
95.Irmo3.3%2.4%(+0.894)#952.6%(+0.720)#7,051
96.Allendale3.3%2.4%(+0.871)#962.6%(+0.697)#7,134
97.Goose Creek3.2%2.4%(+0.852)#972.6%(+0.678)#7,187
98.Forestbrook3.2%2.4%(+0.781)#982.6%(+0.606)#7,441
99.Swansea3.2%2.4%(+0.764)#992.6%(+0.589)#7,492
100.Turbeville3.1%2.4%(+0.723)#1002.6%(+0.549)#7,648

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina are:
#1
34.3%
#2
16.3%
#3
15.2%
#4
12.7%
#5
12.5%
#6
11.7%
#7
11.1%
#8
10.9%
#9
10.2%
#10
9.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina?
Boykin has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina with 34.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in South Carolina is 2.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States is 2.6%.