Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa

0.0%
20.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.7411616.3%7.2%(+9.11)#446.9%(+9.40)#2,467
2.7411015.2%7.2%(+8.07)#516.9%(+8.36)#2,972
3.7412915.1%7.2%(+7.98)#526.9%(+8.27)#3,028
4.7414614.2%7.2%(+7.07)#586.9%(+7.37)#3,571
5.7412814.1%7.2%(+6.96)#596.9%(+7.25)#3,660
6.7411514.1%7.2%(+6.93)#606.9%(+7.23)#3,679
7.7410810.3%7.2%(+3.10)#1416.9%(+3.40)#8,098
8.7413010.1%7.2%(+2.95)#1556.9%(+3.24)#8,371
9.741349.4%7.2%(+2.23)#1886.9%(+2.52)#9,748
10.741268.7%7.2%(+1.58)#2246.9%(+1.87)#11,139
11.741078.7%7.2%(+1.50)#2276.9%(+1.79)#11,349
12.741068.2%7.2%(+1.05)#2536.9%(+1.34)#12,419
13.741128.1%7.2%(+0.963)#2616.9%(+1.26)#12,613
14.741457.1%7.2%(-0.048)#3416.9%(+0.245)#15,377
15.741046.6%7.2%(-0.605)#3766.9%(-0.311)#17,105
16.741316.3%7.2%(-0.831)#3956.9%(-0.538)#17,820
17.741275.6%7.2%(-1.59)#4376.9%(-1.29)#20,211
18.741355.0%7.2%(-2.17)#4726.9%(-1.88)#21,946
19.741144.8%7.2%(-2.37)#4906.9%(-2.07)#22,529
20.741364.5%7.2%(-2.63)#5126.9%(-2.34)#23,273
21.741334.2%7.2%(-2.99)#5316.9%(-2.70)#24,299
22.741324.1%7.2%(-3.07)#5346.9%(-2.77)#24,469
23.741203.8%7.2%(-3.32)#5476.9%(-3.03)#25,131
24.741053.6%7.2%(-3.58)#5596.9%(-3.28)#25,666
25.741373.5%7.2%(-3.63)#5636.9%(-3.33)#25,777
26.741193.4%7.2%(-3.72)#5696.9%(-3.43)#25,989
27.741710.36%7.2%(-6.81)#6176.9%(-6.52)#29,490

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
16.3%
#2
15.2%
#3
15.1%
#4
14.2%
#5
14.1%
#6
14.1%
#7
10.3%
#8
10.1%
#9
9.4%
#10
8.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK?
74116 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK with 16.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Tulsa is 7.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.