Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1.74117100.0%74.4%(+25.6)#1462.5%(+37.5)#1,709
2.7412692.6%74.4%(+18.2)#5562.5%(+30.1)#4,968
3.7411490.0%74.4%(+15.6)#8262.5%(+27.5)#6,571
4.7411087.9%74.4%(+13.5)#11462.5%(+25.4)#8,002
5.7412782.8%74.4%(+8.40)#20862.5%(+20.3)#11,936
6.7410882.1%74.4%(+7.70)#23362.5%(+19.6)#12,529
7.7411280.2%74.4%(+5.80)#27262.5%(+17.7)#14,033
8.7411579.8%74.4%(+5.40)#28362.5%(+17.3)#14,332
9.7413078.8%74.4%(+4.40)#30662.5%(+16.3)#15,155
10.7413175.8%74.4%(+1.40)#37362.5%(+13.3)#17,572
11.7410673.3%74.4%(-1.10)#42062.5%(+10.8)#19,383
12.7413472.2%74.4%(-2.20)#44762.5%(+9.70)#20,151
13.7410771.7%74.4%(-2.70)#45562.5%(+9.20)#20,525
14.7412871.1%74.4%(-3.30)#46862.5%(+8.60)#20,961
15.7410471.0%74.4%(-3.40)#47262.5%(+8.50)#21,041
16.7412966.8%74.4%(-7.60)#52762.5%(+4.30)#23,497
17.7414566.8%74.4%(-7.60)#52862.5%(+4.30)#23,498
18.7413765.9%74.4%(-8.50)#54062.5%(+3.40)#23,984
19.7413264.5%74.4%(-9.90)#55862.5%(+2.00)#24,687
20.7410561.5%74.4%(-12.9)#58262.5%(-1.00)#25,922
21.7413560.6%74.4%(-13.8)#59162.5%(-1.90)#26,242
22.7413354.6%74.4%(-19.8)#61662.5%(-7.90)#28,166
23.7412046.2%74.4%(-28.2)#63162.5%(-16.3)#29,770
24.7414645.9%74.4%(-28.5)#63262.5%(-16.6)#29,809
25.7411642.6%74.4%(-31.8)#63962.5%(-19.9)#30,246
26.7413633.5%74.4%(-40.9)#64462.5%(-29.0)#31,077
27.7411913.0%74.4%(-61.4)#64962.5%(-49.5)#32,007
28.741033.6%74.4%(-70.8)#65362.5%(-58.9)#32,366

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
92.6%
#3
90.0%
#4
87.9%
#5
82.8%
#6
82.1%
#7
80.2%
#8
79.8%
#9
78.8%
#10
75.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
74117 has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa is 64.1%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Oklahoma is 74.4%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.