Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1.6811468.0%34.4%(+33.6)#138.5%(+29.5)#45
2.6896659.5%34.4%(+25.1)#238.5%(+21.0)#330
3.6804658.4%34.4%(+24.0)#338.5%(+19.9)#428
4.6811058.1%34.4%(+23.7)#438.5%(+19.6)#466
5.6884756.5%34.4%(+22.1)#538.5%(+18.0)#622
6.6850255.2%34.4%(+20.8)#638.5%(+16.7)#778
7.6810754.0%34.4%(+19.6)#738.5%(+15.5)#922
8.6870152.2%34.4%(+17.8)#838.5%(+13.7)#1,166
9.6813451.8%34.4%(+17.4)#938.5%(+13.3)#1,227
10.6850550.9%34.4%(+16.5)#1038.5%(+12.4)#1,356
11.6811746.9%34.4%(+12.5)#1138.5%(+8.40)#2,236
12.6811845.6%34.4%(+11.2)#1238.5%(+7.10)#2,563
13.6851242.7%34.4%(+8.30)#1338.5%(+4.20)#3,365
14.6852242.5%34.4%(+8.10)#1438.5%(+4.00)#3,421
15.6814441.4%34.4%(+7.00)#1538.5%(+2.90)#3,731
16.6812441.3%34.4%(+6.90)#1638.5%(+2.80)#3,766
17.6810541.0%34.4%(+6.60)#1738.5%(+2.50)#3,832
18.6880340.5%34.4%(+6.10)#1838.5%(+2.00)#4,014
19.6850438.4%34.4%(+4.00)#1938.5%(-0.100)#4,727
20.6807138.4%34.4%(+4.00)#2038.5%(-0.100)#4,741
21.6851637.3%34.4%(+2.90)#2138.5%(-1.20)#5,018
22.6811135.7%34.4%(+1.30)#2238.5%(-2.80)#5,495
23.6810835.1%34.4%(+0.700)#2338.5%(-3.40)#5,677
24.6850634.3%34.4%(-0.100)#2438.5%(-4.20)#5,884
25.6851033.8%34.4%(-0.600)#2538.5%(-4.70)#6,017
26.6810231.9%34.4%(-2.50)#2638.5%(-6.60)#6,471
27.6813131.3%34.4%(-3.10)#2738.5%(-7.20)#6,608
28.6813229.7%34.4%(-4.70)#2838.5%(-8.80)#6,939
29.6815227.4%34.4%(-7.00)#2938.5%(-11.1)#7,288
30.6810626.3%34.4%(-8.10)#3038.5%(-12.2)#7,438
31.6810426.0%34.4%(-8.40)#3138.5%(-12.5)#7,460
32.6852125.7%34.4%(-8.70)#3238.5%(-12.8)#7,503
33.6850325.5%34.4%(-8.90)#3338.5%(-13.0)#7,539
34.6876025.5%34.4%(-8.90)#3438.5%(-13.0)#7,544
35.6880124.8%34.4%(-9.60)#3538.5%(-13.7)#7,607
36.6850823.8%34.4%(-10.6)#3638.5%(-14.7)#7,719
37.6811222.3%34.4%(-12.1)#3738.5%(-16.2)#7,879
38.6817822.3%34.4%(-12.1)#3838.5%(-16.2)#7,882
39.6803922.0%34.4%(-12.4)#3938.5%(-16.5)#7,894
40.6910121.8%34.4%(-12.6)#4038.5%(-16.7)#7,906
41.6818219.9%34.4%(-14.5)#4138.5%(-18.6)#8,061
42.6813718.9%34.4%(-15.5)#4238.5%(-19.6)#8,125

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska are:
#1
68.0%
#2
59.5%
#3
58.4%
#4
58.1%
#5
56.5%
#6
55.2%
#7
54.0%
#8
52.2%
#9
51.8%
#10
50.9%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska?
68114 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska with 68.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska is 34.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.