Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha

0.0%
20.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.6810717.4%7.3%(+10.0)#266.9%(+10.5)#2,087
2.6811715.2%7.3%(+7.88)#446.9%(+8.35)#2,978
3.6811111.4%7.3%(+4.05)#936.9%(+4.52)#6,372
4.6811210.4%7.3%(+3.09)#1136.9%(+3.56)#7,815
5.6810810.3%7.3%(+3.00)#1156.9%(+3.47)#7,992
6.6810510.0%7.3%(+2.63)#1246.9%(+3.10)#8,606
7.681279.3%7.3%(+1.98)#1456.9%(+2.45)#9,879
8.681579.2%7.3%(+1.88)#1496.9%(+2.35)#10,099
9.681369.2%7.3%(+1.86)#1526.9%(+2.33)#10,153
10.681389.0%7.3%(+1.65)#1586.9%(+2.12)#10,601
11.681428.9%7.3%(+1.54)#1626.9%(+2.01)#10,857
12.681108.8%7.3%(+1.41)#1666.9%(+1.88)#11,122
13.681068.0%7.3%(+0.611)#2056.9%(+1.08)#13,072
14.681377.9%7.3%(+0.512)#2156.9%(+0.982)#13,345
15.681347.7%7.3%(+0.330)#2266.9%(+0.801)#13,828
16.681247.5%7.3%(+0.191)#2356.9%(+0.661)#14,231
17.681527.4%7.3%(+0.052)#2426.9%(+0.522)#14,618
18.681547.1%7.3%(-0.240)#2496.9%(+0.231)#15,418
19.681046.8%7.3%(-0.499)#2666.9%(-0.029)#16,209
20.681226.2%7.3%(-1.11)#3156.9%(-0.638)#18,141
21.681355.8%7.3%(-1.59)#3406.9%(-1.12)#19,688
22.681145.7%7.3%(-1.62)#3446.9%(-1.15)#19,752
23.681325.7%7.3%(-1.68)#3486.9%(-1.21)#19,916
24.681445.6%7.3%(-1.73)#3506.9%(-1.26)#20,111
25.681305.3%7.3%(-2.00)#3706.9%(-1.53)#20,899
26.681645.2%7.3%(-2.14)#3796.9%(-1.66)#21,307
27.681184.9%7.3%(-2.42)#3896.9%(-1.95)#22,157
28.681164.0%7.3%(-3.31)#4326.9%(-2.84)#24,684
29.681313.6%7.3%(-3.70)#4516.9%(-3.23)#25,560
30.681783.1%7.3%(-4.22)#4706.9%(-3.74)#26,627
31.681022.9%7.3%(-4.40)#4786.9%(-3.93)#27,003

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE are:
#1
17.4%
#2
15.2%
#3
11.4%
#4
10.4%
#5
10.3%
#6
10.0%
#7
9.3%
#8
9.2%
#9
9.2%
#10
9.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE?
68107 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE with 17.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Omaha is 7.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Nebraska is 7.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.