Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Farming, Fishing & Forestry
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Kramer100.0%1.6%(+98.4)#10.61%(+99.4)#13
2.Hansboro66.7%1.6%(+65.1)#20.61%(+66.1)#38
3.Brocket60.0%1.6%(+58.4)#30.61%(+59.4)#46
4.Egeland56.8%1.6%(+55.2)#40.61%(+56.2)#56
5.Cathay50.0%1.6%(+48.4)#50.61%(+49.4)#80
6.Sarles50.0%1.6%(+48.4)#60.61%(+49.4)#81
7.Ardoch46.2%1.6%(+44.6)#70.61%(+45.5)#90
8.Wolford42.9%1.6%(+41.3)#80.61%(+42.3)#109
9.Alsen35.7%1.6%(+34.1)#90.61%(+35.1)#157
10.York30.8%1.6%(+29.2)#100.61%(+30.2)#211
11.Forest River30.2%1.6%(+28.6)#110.61%(+29.6)#220
12.White Earth25.0%1.6%(+23.4)#120.61%(+24.4)#325
13.Niagara23.5%1.6%(+21.9)#130.61%(+22.9)#352
14.Hazelton23.1%1.6%(+21.6)#140.61%(+22.5)#357
15.Tuttle22.2%1.6%(+20.6)#150.61%(+21.6)#379
16.Robinson19.0%1.6%(+17.5)#160.61%(+18.4)#472
17.Hampden18.2%1.6%(+16.6)#170.61%(+17.6)#505
18.Pettibone17.4%1.6%(+15.8)#180.61%(+16.8)#539
19.Wimbledon15.6%1.6%(+14.0)#190.61%(+15.0)#606
20.Coleharbor15.4%1.6%(+13.8)#200.61%(+14.8)#623
21.Butte15.0%1.6%(+13.4)#210.61%(+14.4)#644
22.Landa14.6%1.6%(+13.0)#220.61%(+14.0)#662
23.Rhame14.1%1.6%(+12.5)#230.61%(+13.5)#703
24.Pisek14.0%1.6%(+12.4)#240.61%(+13.3)#714
25.Hoople13.6%1.6%(+12.0)#250.61%(+13.0)#732
26.Newburg12.9%1.6%(+11.3)#260.61%(+12.3)#793
27.Cando12.6%1.6%(+11.0)#270.61%(+12.0)#810
28.Fessenden12.1%1.6%(+10.5)#280.61%(+11.5)#856
29.Minto11.1%1.6%(+9.52)#290.61%(+10.5)#935
30.Marmarth10.8%1.6%(+9.22)#300.61%(+10.2)#971
31.Grace City10.0%1.6%(+8.41)#310.61%(+9.39)#1,076
32.Springbrook10.0%1.6%(+8.41)#320.61%(+9.39)#1,078
33.Wishek9.9%1.6%(+8.34)#330.61%(+9.33)#1,083
34.Ryder9.8%1.6%(+8.17)#340.61%(+9.15)#1,108
35.Grandin9.5%1.6%(+7.94)#350.61%(+8.92)#1,142
36.Adams9.5%1.6%(+7.94)#360.61%(+8.92)#1,145
37.Crystal9.5%1.6%(+7.94)#370.61%(+8.92)#1,146
38.Tower City9.3%1.6%(+7.69)#380.61%(+8.67)#1,181
39.Sanborn9.0%1.6%(+7.39)#390.61%(+8.37)#1,233
40.Clifford8.9%1.6%(+7.30)#400.61%(+8.28)#1,254
41.Edinburg8.3%1.6%(+6.75)#410.61%(+7.73)#1,352
42.Hettinger8.3%1.6%(+6.73)#420.61%(+7.71)#1,366
43.Munich8.2%1.6%(+6.60)#430.61%(+7.58)#1,386
44.Conway7.7%1.6%(+6.10)#440.61%(+7.09)#1,507
45.Finley7.4%1.6%(+5.79)#450.61%(+6.78)#1,579
46.Walhalla7.4%1.6%(+5.78)#460.61%(+6.76)#1,582
47.Sherwood7.3%1.6%(+5.70)#470.61%(+6.69)#1,599
48.Scranton7.2%1.6%(+5.66)#480.61%(+6.64)#1,605
49.Tappen7.2%1.6%(+5.62)#490.61%(+6.60)#1,612
50.Lehr7.1%1.6%(+5.55)#500.61%(+6.54)#1,632
51.Berlin7.1%1.6%(+5.55)#510.61%(+6.54)#1,635
52.Hunter6.7%1.6%(+5.16)#520.61%(+6.14)#1,721
53.Fordville6.2%1.6%(+4.57)#530.61%(+5.55)#1,872
54.Makoti6.1%1.6%(+4.47)#540.61%(+5.46)#1,909
55.Hannaford5.9%1.6%(+4.29)#550.61%(+5.28)#1,966
56.Alamo5.9%1.6%(+4.29)#560.61%(+5.28)#1,969
57.Wyndmere5.8%1.6%(+4.25)#570.61%(+5.23)#1,979
58.Bowdon5.8%1.6%(+4.23)#580.61%(+5.21)#1,984
59.Page5.7%1.6%(+4.13)#590.61%(+5.11)#2,015
60.Spiritwood Lake5.7%1.6%(+4.13)#600.61%(+5.11)#2,016
61.Binford5.6%1.6%(+4.05)#610.61%(+5.03)#2,041
62.Leeds5.6%1.6%(+3.99)#620.61%(+4.97)#2,057
63.Pekin5.6%1.6%(+3.97)#630.61%(+4.95)#2,076
64.Kenmare5.5%1.6%(+3.89)#640.61%(+4.88)#2,100
65.Ashley5.5%1.6%(+3.89)#650.61%(+4.87)#2,103
66.Fairmount5.5%1.6%(+3.89)#660.61%(+4.87)#2,106
67.Richardton5.5%1.6%(+3.86)#670.61%(+4.84)#2,125
68.White Shield5.3%1.6%(+3.73)#680.61%(+4.71)#2,179
69.Oakes5.2%1.6%(+3.65)#690.61%(+4.63)#2,212
70.Steele5.2%1.6%(+3.59)#700.61%(+4.58)#2,229
71.New England5.1%1.6%(+3.47)#710.61%(+4.45)#2,279
72.Berthold5.0%1.6%(+3.44)#720.61%(+4.42)#2,292
73.Neche5.0%1.6%(+3.41)#730.61%(+4.39)#2,299
74.Sheldon4.7%1.6%(+3.13)#740.61%(+4.11)#2,440
75.Upham4.5%1.6%(+2.96)#750.61%(+3.94)#2,512
76.Canton City Hensel4.5%1.6%(+2.96)#760.61%(+3.94)#2,519
77.Grafton4.5%1.6%(+2.95)#770.61%(+3.94)#2,521
78.Towner4.5%1.6%(+2.91)#780.61%(+3.89)#2,542
79.Dazey4.4%1.6%(+2.86)#790.61%(+3.84)#2,576
80.Aneta4.4%1.6%(+2.82)#800.61%(+3.81)#2,587
81.Dawson4.3%1.6%(+2.76)#810.61%(+3.74)#2,627
82.Hope4.3%1.6%(+2.73)#820.61%(+3.71)#2,640
83.Stanton4.1%1.6%(+2.50)#830.61%(+3.49)#2,765
84.Devils Lake4.0%1.6%(+2.43)#840.61%(+3.42)#2,808
85.Gackle4.0%1.6%(+2.41)#850.61%(+3.39)#2,817
86.Reile S Acres3.9%1.6%(+2.30)#860.61%(+3.29)#2,902
87.Bucyrus3.8%1.6%(+2.26)#870.61%(+3.24)#2,940
88.Ray3.7%1.6%(+2.07)#880.61%(+3.05)#3,072
89.Portland3.6%1.6%(+2.05)#890.61%(+3.03)#3,088
90.Crary3.6%1.6%(+2.05)#900.61%(+3.03)#3,095
91.Barney3.6%1.6%(+1.98)#910.61%(+2.97)#3,160
92.Napoleon3.6%1.6%(+1.97)#920.61%(+2.96)#3,163
93.Mohall3.6%1.6%(+1.97)#930.61%(+2.95)#3,170
94.Northwood3.4%1.6%(+1.86)#940.61%(+2.84)#3,246
95.Hague3.4%1.6%(+1.86)#950.61%(+2.84)#3,255
96.Harvey3.4%1.6%(+1.83)#960.61%(+2.81)#3,279
97.Parshall3.4%1.6%(+1.81)#970.61%(+2.79)#3,290
98.Kulm3.3%1.6%(+1.72)#980.61%(+2.70)#3,364
99.Edmore3.3%1.6%(+1.70)#990.61%(+2.68)#3,382
100.Gilby3.3%1.6%(+1.69)#1000.61%(+2.67)#3,390

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
66.7%
#3
60.0%
#4
56.8%
#5
50.0%
#6
50.0%
#7
46.2%
#8
42.9%
#9
35.7%
#10
30.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota?
Kramer has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in North Dakota is 1.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Farming, Fishing & Forestry in the United States is 0.61%.