Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Loraine66.7%5.8%(+60.9)#15.0%(+61.7)#75
2.Mcgregor57.7%5.8%(+51.9)#25.0%(+52.7)#107
3.Denhoff50.0%5.8%(+44.2)#35.0%(+45.0)#182
4.Sutton45.5%5.8%(+39.7)#45.0%(+40.5)#213
5.Nekoma42.9%5.8%(+37.1)#55.0%(+37.9)#245
6.Braddock42.9%5.8%(+37.1)#65.0%(+37.9)#246
7.Brooktree Park35.2%5.8%(+29.4)#75.0%(+30.2)#384
8.Martin35.0%5.8%(+29.2)#85.0%(+30.0)#389
9.Porcupine33.3%5.8%(+27.5)#95.0%(+28.3)#418
10.Rhame32.4%5.8%(+26.6)#105.0%(+27.4)#456
11.Verona32.4%5.8%(+26.6)#115.0%(+27.4)#459
12.York30.8%5.8%(+25.0)#125.0%(+25.8)#513
13.Palermo29.0%5.8%(+23.2)#135.0%(+24.0)#587
14.Fingal27.2%5.8%(+21.4)#145.0%(+22.2)#696
15.Willow City26.5%5.8%(+20.7)#155.0%(+21.5)#748
16.Davenport25.0%5.8%(+19.2)#165.0%(+20.0)#827
17.Erie25.0%5.8%(+19.2)#175.0%(+20.0)#843
18.Englevale25.0%5.8%(+19.2)#185.0%(+20.0)#846
19.Amidon25.0%5.8%(+19.2)#195.0%(+20.0)#848
20.Alexander24.6%5.8%(+18.8)#205.0%(+19.6)#871
21.Driscoll24.0%5.8%(+18.2)#215.0%(+19.0)#917
22.Des Lacs23.9%5.8%(+18.1)#225.0%(+18.9)#925
23.Robinson23.8%5.8%(+18.0)#235.0%(+18.8)#939
24.Kensal23.7%5.8%(+17.9)#245.0%(+18.7)#944
25.Bucyrus23.1%5.8%(+17.3)#255.0%(+18.1)#1,009
26.Manning22.7%5.8%(+16.9)#265.0%(+17.7)#1,047
27.Cogswell22.6%5.8%(+16.8)#275.0%(+17.6)#1,058
28.Tuttle22.2%5.8%(+16.4)#285.0%(+17.2)#1,109
29.Gardena22.2%5.8%(+16.4)#295.0%(+17.2)#1,111
30.Mcclusky21.7%5.8%(+15.9)#305.0%(+16.7)#1,167
31.Logan21.6%5.8%(+15.8)#315.0%(+16.6)#1,183
32.Sheldon20.8%5.8%(+15.0)#325.0%(+15.8)#1,279
33.Litchville20.8%5.8%(+15.0)#335.0%(+15.8)#1,280
34.Streeter19.5%5.8%(+13.7)#345.0%(+14.5)#1,447
35.Dwight19.4%5.8%(+13.6)#355.0%(+14.4)#1,481
36.Maxbass18.9%5.8%(+13.1)#365.0%(+13.9)#1,557
37.Almont18.8%5.8%(+13.0)#375.0%(+13.8)#1,564
38.Four Bears Village18.3%5.8%(+12.5)#385.0%(+13.3)#1,656
39.Sentinel Butte18.2%5.8%(+12.4)#395.0%(+13.2)#1,697
40.Canton City Hensel18.2%5.8%(+12.4)#405.0%(+13.2)#1,699
41.Foxholm17.2%5.8%(+11.4)#415.0%(+12.2)#1,900
42.Crosby16.8%5.8%(+11.0)#425.0%(+11.8)#2,006
43.Hazelton16.7%5.8%(+10.9)#435.0%(+11.7)#2,047
44.Pekin16.7%5.8%(+10.9)#445.0%(+11.7)#2,061
45.Fredonia16.7%5.8%(+10.9)#455.0%(+11.7)#2,068
46.Gascoyne16.7%5.8%(+10.9)#465.0%(+11.7)#2,069
47.Calvin16.7%5.8%(+10.9)#475.0%(+11.7)#2,070
48.Dunn Center16.2%5.8%(+10.4)#485.0%(+11.2)#2,185
49.Newburg16.1%5.8%(+10.3)#495.0%(+11.1)#2,204
50.Watford City16.0%5.8%(+10.2)#505.0%(+11.0)#2,247
51.Regent15.4%5.8%(+9.59)#515.0%(+10.4)#2,412
52.Hazen15.3%5.8%(+9.47)#525.0%(+10.3)#2,456
53.Green Acres15.2%5.8%(+9.39)#535.0%(+10.2)#2,485
54.Zap14.8%5.8%(+8.96)#545.0%(+9.76)#2,650
55.Killdeer14.6%5.8%(+8.76)#555.0%(+9.57)#2,725
56.Washburn14.6%5.8%(+8.75)#565.0%(+9.56)#2,730
57.Wilton14.4%5.8%(+8.57)#575.0%(+9.38)#2,782
58.Drayton14.4%5.8%(+8.56)#585.0%(+9.36)#2,788
59.Balta14.3%5.8%(+8.49)#595.0%(+9.29)#2,823
60.Jud14.3%5.8%(+8.49)#605.0%(+9.29)#2,825
61.Berthold14.1%5.8%(+8.27)#615.0%(+9.08)#2,896
62.Hague13.8%5.8%(+7.99)#625.0%(+8.80)#3,022
63.Halliday13.5%5.8%(+7.68)#635.0%(+8.49)#3,151
64.Page13.3%5.8%(+7.53)#645.0%(+8.34)#3,219
65.Elgin13.3%5.8%(+7.51)#655.0%(+8.32)#3,234
66.Forest River13.2%5.8%(+7.41)#665.0%(+8.21)#3,281
67.Scranton13.0%5.8%(+7.24)#675.0%(+8.05)#3,360
68.Karlsruhe13.0%5.8%(+7.24)#685.0%(+8.05)#3,371
69.Noonan12.9%5.8%(+7.10)#695.0%(+7.91)#3,434
70.Tioga12.9%5.8%(+7.09)#705.0%(+7.89)#3,445
71.Burlington12.9%5.8%(+7.06)#715.0%(+7.87)#3,455
72.Reynolds12.6%5.8%(+6.75)#725.0%(+7.56)#3,603
73.Bottineau12.5%5.8%(+6.70)#735.0%(+7.51)#3,616
74.Kenmare12.5%5.8%(+6.68)#745.0%(+7.48)#3,664
75.Epping12.3%5.8%(+6.48)#755.0%(+7.29)#3,768
76.Makoti12.1%5.8%(+6.32)#765.0%(+7.13)#3,861
77.Wing12.1%5.8%(+6.27)#775.0%(+7.07)#3,887
78.Mohall11.9%5.8%(+6.06)#785.0%(+6.86)#4,024
79.Flaxton11.8%5.8%(+5.97)#795.0%(+6.77)#4,103
80.Lignite11.7%5.8%(+5.89)#805.0%(+6.69)#4,148
81.Westhope11.0%5.8%(+5.19)#815.0%(+5.99)#4,665
82.Arthur11.0%5.8%(+5.17)#825.0%(+5.97)#4,682
83.Tolna10.9%5.8%(+5.11)#835.0%(+5.92)#4,738
84.Tappen10.8%5.8%(+5.01)#845.0%(+5.82)#4,810
85.Hope10.8%5.8%(+4.99)#855.0%(+5.80)#4,826
86.Carpio10.7%5.8%(+4.87)#865.0%(+5.67)#4,941
87.Fort Ransom10.6%5.8%(+4.84)#875.0%(+5.64)#4,965
88.Upham10.6%5.8%(+4.81)#885.0%(+5.61)#4,980
89.Emerado10.6%5.8%(+4.78)#895.0%(+5.58)#4,996
90.Underwood10.5%5.8%(+4.74)#905.0%(+5.55)#5,026
91.Belfield10.5%5.8%(+4.73)#915.0%(+5.53)#5,038
92.North River10.5%5.8%(+4.73)#925.0%(+5.53)#5,063
93.Mcville10.4%5.8%(+4.61)#935.0%(+5.41)#5,148
94.New England10.4%5.8%(+4.57)#945.0%(+5.38)#5,182
95.Oriska10.3%5.8%(+4.55)#955.0%(+5.35)#5,218
96.Souris10.3%5.8%(+4.55)#965.0%(+5.35)#5,226
97.Mooreton10.3%5.8%(+4.46)#975.0%(+5.26)#5,308
98.Center10.2%5.8%(+4.44)#985.0%(+5.25)#5,319
99.Springbrook10.0%5.8%(+4.20)#995.0%(+5.01)#5,579
100.Parshall10.0%5.8%(+4.18)#1005.0%(+4.98)#5,592

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota are:
#1
66.7%
#2
50.0%
#3
45.5%
#4
42.9%
#5
42.9%
#6
35.2%
#7
35.0%
#8
33.3%
#9
32.4%
#10
32.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota?
Loraine has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota with 66.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in North Dakota is 5.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.