Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indianapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.4621454.7%30.2%(+24.5)#6933.4%(+21.3)#2,940
2.4623751.0%30.2%(+20.8)#9433.4%(+17.6)#4,174
3.4623450.0%30.2%(+19.8)#10333.4%(+16.6)#4,561
4.4625449.2%30.2%(+19.0)#11333.4%(+15.8)#4,856
5.4625046.2%30.2%(+16.0)#13533.4%(+12.8)#5,961
6.4620541.9%30.2%(+11.7)#17033.4%(+8.50)#7,584
7.4623541.0%30.2%(+10.8)#17733.4%(+7.60)#7,950
8.4622840.2%30.2%(+10.0)#18833.4%(+6.80)#8,330
9.4623639.2%30.2%(+9.00)#19933.4%(+5.80)#8,716
10.4620339.1%30.2%(+8.90)#20233.4%(+5.70)#8,753
11.4622638.7%30.2%(+8.50)#20933.4%(+5.30)#8,912
12.4622138.5%30.2%(+8.30)#21333.4%(+5.10)#9,018
13.4622437.2%30.2%(+7.00)#22133.4%(+3.80)#9,594
14.4621836.8%30.2%(+6.60)#22733.4%(+3.40)#9,743
15.4622036.3%30.2%(+6.10)#23133.4%(+2.90)#9,962
16.4620136.1%30.2%(+5.90)#23333.4%(+2.70)#10,035
17.4626036.0%30.2%(+5.80)#23433.4%(+2.60)#10,065
18.4622534.4%30.2%(+4.20)#24933.4%(+1.00)#10,834
19.4624132.4%30.2%(+2.20)#26633.4%(-1.000)#11,647
20.4624031.2%30.2%(+1.00)#27533.4%(-2.20)#12,117
21.4621930.2%30.2%(=0.000)#28433.4%(-3.20)#12,533
22.4620429.7%30.2%(-0.500)#28833.4%(-3.70)#12,726
23.4620228.1%30.2%(-2.10)#30133.4%(-5.30)#13,302
24.4622226.4%30.2%(-3.80)#31333.4%(-7.00)#13,894
25.4626822.4%30.2%(-7.80)#33333.4%(-11.0)#15,143
26.4622721.8%30.2%(-8.40)#34033.4%(-11.6)#15,348
27.4620821.2%30.2%(-9.00)#35333.4%(-12.2)#15,710
28.4625620.9%30.2%(-9.30)#35733.4%(-12.5)#15,857
29.4623920.8%30.2%(-9.40)#35933.4%(-12.6)#15,909
30.4621719.9%30.2%(-10.3)#36933.4%(-13.5)#16,280

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN are:
#1
54.7%
#2
51.0%
#3
50.0%
#4
49.2%
#5
46.2%
#6
41.9%
#7
41.0%
#8
40.2%
#9
39.2%
#10
39.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN?
46214 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN with 54.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis, IN?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indianapolis is 30.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana is 30.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.