Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Not in Labor Force in Connecticut |
|
| Connecticut Report: |
Percentage of Population Not in Labor Force
|
|
| 1. | South Lyme, Connecticut (1) | | 68 | 77.77 % | #147 | | 2. | Quinebaug, Connecticut (1) | | 462 | 52.02 % | #2,409 | | 3. | Somers, Connecticut (1) | | 10,456 | 49.74 % | #3,148 | | 4. | Salisbury, Connecticut (1) | | 1,363 | 46.60 % | #4,705 | | 5. | Niantic, Connecticut (1) | | 12,152 | 46.41 % | #4,810 | | 6. | Suffield, Connecticut (1) | | 10,421 | 45.96 % | #5,088 | | 7. | Southbury, Connecticut (1) | | 18,567 | 43.98 % | #6,544 | | 8. | Hartford, Connecticut (6) | % Not in Labor Force in Hartford, CT | 122,112 | 43.10 % | #7,306 | | 9. | Bantam, Connecticut (1) | | 1,402 | 42.97 % | #7,434 | | 10. | Rockfall, Connecticut (1) | | 1,234 | 41.29 % | #8,978 | | 11. | Bloomfield, Connecticut (1) | | 19,585 | 41.27 % | #9,002 | | 12. | Uncasville, Connecticut (1) | | 12,001 | 41.22 % | #9,046 | | 13. | Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in Storrs Mansfield, CT | 15,979 | 40.31 % | #9,954 | | 14. | New Canaan, Connecticut (1) | | 19,402 | 39.91 % | #10,389 | | 15. | Wethersfield, Connecticut (1) | | 26,303 | 39.74 % | #10,581 | | 16. | Essex, Connecticut (1) | | 3,147 | 39.63 % | #10,706 | | 17. | New Haven, Connecticut (6) | % Not in Labor Force in New Haven, CT | 123,508 | 39.59 % | #10,739 | | 18. | Greenwich, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in Greenwich, CT | 39,719 | 39.18 % | #11,215 | | 19. | Bridgeport, Connecticut (6) | % Not in Labor Force in Bridgeport, CT | 139,505 | 38.86 % | #11,584 | | 20. | Waterbury, Connecticut (6) | % Not in Labor Force in Waterbury, CT | 107,248 | 38.81 % | #11,636 | | 21. | Darien, Connecticut (1) | | 19,607 | 38.37 % | #12,126 | | 22. | Cheshire, Connecticut (1) | | 28,570 | 38.28 % | #12,256 | | 23. | New Britain, Connecticut (3) | % Not in Labor Force in New Britain, CT | 71,546 | 37.75 % | #12,930 | | 24. | Riverside, Connecticut (1) | | 7,724 | 37.63 % | #13,095 | | 25. | Westport, Connecticut (1) | | 25,807 | 37.38 % | #13,372 | | 26. | Brooklyn, Connecticut (1) | | 5,250 | 37.34 % | #13,426 | | 27. | Waterford, Connecticut (1) | | 15,811 | 37.13 % | #13,667 | | 28. | Quaker Hill, Connecticut (1) | | 3,342 | 36.91 % | #13,928 | | 29. | Enfield, Connecticut (1) | | 45,212 | 36.90 % | #13,946 | | 30. | Windham, Connecticut (1) | | 3,246 | 36.80 % | #14,080 | | 31. | Canaan, Connecticut (1) | | 2,828 | 36.35 % | #14,618 | | 32. | Sharon, Connecticut (1) | | 2,752 | 36.30 % | #14,677 | | 33. | Wilton, Connecticut (1) | | 17,637 | 36.26 % | #14,727 | | 34. | Stratford, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in Stratford, CT | 49,976 | 36.20 % | #14,789 | | 35. | Gilman, Connecticut (1) | | 47 | 36.11 % | #14,927 | | 36. | Trumbull, Connecticut (1) | | 34,267 | 36.01 % | #15,064 | | 37. | Old Saybrook, Connecticut (1) | | 10,367 | 35.96 % | #15,122 | | 38. | East Hartford, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in East Hartford, CT | 49,575 | 35.87 % | #15,232 | | 39. | Old Greenwich, Connecticut (1) | | 7,092 | 35.79 % | #15,351 | | 40. | Litchfield, Connecticut (1) | | 5,750 | 35.76 % | #15,384 | | 41. | Orange, Connecticut (1) | | 13,233 | 35.73 % | #15,423 | | 42. | Farmington, Connecticut (1) | | 16,283 | 35.67 % | #15,517 | | 43. | Falls Village, Connecticut (1) | | 1,472 | 35.65 % | #15,539 | | 44. | Pawcatuck, Connecticut (1) | | 8,696 | 35.45 % | #15,798 | | 45. | Hamden, Connecticut (3) | % Not in Labor Force in Hamden, CT | 56,856 | 35.40 % | #15,854 | | 46. | Old Lyme, Connecticut (1) | | 9,354 | 35.25 % | #16,047 | | 47. | West Hartford, Connecticut (4) | % Not in Labor Force in West Hartford, CT | 63,054 | 35.24 % | #16,070 | | 48. | Centerbrook, Connecticut (1) | | 556 | 35.14 % | #16,190 | | 49. | Newtown, Connecticut (1) | | 14,709 | 35.01 % | #16,336 | | 50. | East Haven, Connecticut (1) | | 28,166 | 35.01 % | #16,344 | | 51. | Goshen, Connecticut (1) | | 2,604 | 35.00 % | #16,355 | | 52. | North Haven, Connecticut (1) | | 23,234 | 34.95 % | #16,420 | | 53. | Cos Cob, Connecticut (1) | | 6,751 | 34.82 % | #16,584 | | 54. | Willimantic, Connecticut (1) | | 18,200 | 34.81 % | #16,602 | | 55. | Washington Depot, Connecticut (1) | | 986 | 34.78 % | #16,646 | | 56. | Easton, Connecticut (1) | | 7,272 | 34.50 % | #17,003 | | 57. | Ridgefield, Connecticut (1) | | 23,686 | 34.30 % | #17,265 | | 58. | West Granby, Connecticut (1) | | 717 | 34.29 % | #17,273 | | 59. | Torrington, Connecticut (1) | | 35,313 | 34.29 % | #17,281 | | 60. | Taftville, Connecticut (1) | | 2,905 | 34.17 % | #17,392 | | 61. | New London, Connecticut (1) | | 25,671 | 34.15 % | #17,417 | | 62. | Ansonia, Connecticut (1) | | 18,554 | 34.02 % | #17,572 | | 63. | West Simsbury, Connecticut (1) | | 4,187 | 33.99 % | #17,614 | | 64. | Stonington, Connecticut (1) | | 5,348 | 33.96 % | #17,636 | | 65. | Derby, Connecticut (1) | | 12,391 | 33.91 % | #17,694 | | 66. | Oneco, Connecticut (1) | | 273 | 33.90 % | #17,718 | | 67. | Meriden, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in Meriden, CT | 58,244 | 33.86 % | #17,771 | | 68. | Simsbury, Connecticut (1) | | 14,346 | 33.73 % | #17,925 | | 69. | Weston, Connecticut (1) | | 10,037 | 33.64 % | #18,041 | | 70. | Avon, Connecticut (1) | | 16,090 | 33.47 % | #18,232 | | 71. | Westbrook, Connecticut (1) | | 6,324 | 33.35 % | #18,365 | | 72. | Kent, Connecticut (1) | | 2,230 | 33.31 % | #18,424 | | 73. | Norwich, Connecticut (1) | | 38,264 | 33.24 % | #18,503 | | 74. | Newington, Connecticut (1) | | 29,274 | 32.89 % | #18,910 | | 75. | Rocky Hill, Connecticut (1) | | 17,966 | 32.75 % | #19,034 | | 76. | Unionville, Connecticut (1) | | 7,054 | 32.74 % | #19,050 | | 77. | North Branford, Connecticut (1) | | 7,648 | 32.61 % | #19,205 | | 78. | Middlebury, Connecticut (1) | | 6,775 | 32.60 % | #19,215 | | 79. | Mystic, Connecticut (1) | | 12,090 | 32.55 % | #19,272 | | 80. | Woodbridge, Connecticut (1) | | 8,983 | 32.43 % | #19,401 | | 81. | Putnam, Connecticut (1) | | 8,939 | 32.26 % | #19,566 | | 82. | Danielson, Connecticut (1) | | 12,816 | 32.15 % | #19,679 | | 83. | West Haven, Connecticut (1) | | 52,360 | 32.07 % | #19,762 | | 84. | Stamford, Connecticut (6) | % Not in Labor Force in Stamford, CT | 116,898 | 32.03 % | #19,820 | | 85. | Wallingford, Connecticut (1) | | 43,025 | 31.94 % | #19,931 | | 86. | Madison, Connecticut (1) | | 17,858 | 31.94 % | #19,933 | | 87. | Sherman, Connecticut (1) | | 3,939 | 31.90 % | #19,982 | | 88. | North Windham, Connecticut (1) | | 3,278 | 31.73 % | #20,172 | | 89. | Middletown, Connecticut (1) | | 43,167 | 31.72 % | #20,177 | | 90. | Windsor Locks, Connecticut (1) | | 12,045 | 31.33 % | #20,625 | | 91. | Bristol, Connecticut (1) | | 60,153 | 31.31 % | #20,640 | | 92. | Deep River, Connecticut (1) | | 4,610 | 31.22 % | #20,736 | | 93. | East Windsor, Connecticut (1) | | 4,664 | 31.15 % | #20,789 | | 94. | Danbury, Connecticut (2) | % Not in Labor Force in Danbury, CT | 74,453 | 31.04 % | #20,897 | | 95. | Bridgewater, Connecticut (1) | | 1,831 | 30.98 % | #20,950 | | 96. | Dayville, Connecticut (1) | | 6,481 | 30.80 % | #21,136 | | 97. | Redding, Connecticut (1) | | 8,223 | 30.72 % | #21,221 | | 98. | Cromwell, Connecticut (1) | | 12,871 | 30.62 % | #21,296 | | 99. | Naugatuck, Connecticut (1) | | 30,734 | 30.58 % | #21,335 | | 100. | Bozrah, Connecticut (1) | | 2,288 | 30.49 % | #21,418 |
|
| 1-100 out of 221 total | | 1 2 3 ... [ Next >> ] |
|
|
